The osseointegration rate of titanium dental implants is related to their composition and surface
roughness. Rough-surfaced implants favor both bone anchoring and biomechanical stability. There are many different methods which used for increasing surface roughness or applying osteoconductive coatings to titanium dental implants. Surface treatments, such as titanium plasma-spraying, grit-blasting, acid-etching, anodization or calcium phosphate coatings, and their corresponding surface morphologies and properties are described. Most of these surfaces are commercially available and have proven clinical efficacy (＞95% over 5 years). The precise role of surface chemistry and topography on the early events in dental implant osseointegration remain poorly understood. The future of dental implantation should aim to develop surfaces with controlled and standardized topography or chemistry. This approach will be show a way to understand the interactions between proteins, cells, and implant surfaces.
The present work assesses the effect for cell attachment according to different implant surface patterns; smooth surface, anodic spark deposition and Sandblast large grit acid etching. The cell attachment on the surface which was created by anodic spark deposition method is more favor comparison with other two type of surface.
|